Good (i.e. terrible) example of siloed thinking within defined scopes. Naturally the Corps' scope is just death due to the water in the flood, but not the downstream consequences. The point about warning times and response of residents is interesting. Consider what happened in Montpelier, VT in summer 2023 and massive flooding in a "climate change safe county". Nice work on this one.
And now the Chevron decision has been reversed, making it almost impossible to hold the feet of those responsible to the conflagration they will cause.
Good (i.e. terrible) example of siloed thinking within defined scopes. Naturally the Corps' scope is just death due to the water in the flood, but not the downstream consequences. The point about warning times and response of residents is interesting. Consider what happened in Montpelier, VT in summer 2023 and massive flooding in a "climate change safe county". Nice work on this one.
And now the Chevron decision has been reversed, making it almost impossible to hold the feet of those responsible to the conflagration they will cause.